ArticlePloS one2026
Functional status and health-related quality of life following Young and Burgess classified pelvic ring injuries.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine recovery rates of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in terms of functional status and health-related quality of life (HR-Qol) compared to the general population, as well as mortality rates and reintervention rates in patients with Young and Burgess (YB) classified pelvic ring injuries.
methodsThis cohort included patients with YB classified pelvic ring injuries in a level 1 trauma centre between 2007 and 2024. Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment subscales were used to evaluate functional status, and the Dutch version of the EuroQol-5D 5L was used to assess HR-Qol. Outcomes were compared to normative data of the Dutch population. Patient-reported outcomes, mortality, and reintervention rates were reported for each YB classification. Full recovery was defined as reaching the lower level of the 95% confidence interval of the normative data in all outcome measures.
resultsPROMs were available for 346 (75%) of the eligible patients. The median follow-up time was 2.2 (IQR 3.6) years. The following rates of full recovery were observed: lateral compression (LC)1 = 41%, LC2 = 46%, LC3 = 11%, anterior posterior compression (APC)1 = 36%, APC2 = 33%, APC3 = 40%, vertical sheer (VS)=31% and combined mechanical injury (CM) =27%. The highest 30-day mortality rates were found in LC3 (19%), APC3 (16%), and VS (12%) injuries. LC3, APC3, VS, and CM injuries had the highest reintervention rates due to pain or discomfort.
conclusionPatients with LC1, LC2, APC1, APC2, and APC3 had comparable outcomes to the general population, while LC3, VS, and CM injuries had worse outcomes. LC3, APC3, and VS injuries had the highest mortality rates within 30 days of the initial trauma. LC3, APC3, VS, and CM had slightly higher levels of treatment revisions or removal of osteosynthesis material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.