ArticlePloS one2026
Process performance and microbial community dynamics in semi-dry mesophilic co-digestion of crop residues and livestock manure.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semi-dry anaerobic co-digestion represents a promising strategy for efficient resource utilization of diverse agricultural wastes; however, its operational performance under mesophilic conditions and the underlying microbial mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. In this study, a 35-day semi-dry anaerobic co-digestion experiment was conducted using corn stover, wheat straw, cattle manure, and chicken manure as co-substrates, under 12% total solids and 37 °C, to elucidate biogas product dynamics and microbial community succession. The methane production exhibited a distinct biphasic pattern, marked by an initial decline, a prolonged lag phase, and a single, sharp peak that culminated between days 21 and 23. The peak methanogenic potential estimated using the modified Gompertz model reached 137 mL·g-1 VS, indicating incomplete substrate degradation within 35 days. Acetic acid, total volatile fatty acids, and chemical oxygen demand all reached their maximum values on day 15, reflecting intensive hydrolysis and acidogenesis during the first 15 days. In contrast, the lowest pH value was observed on day 15, while ammonia nitrogen concentration fluctuates between 3.5 and 4.0 mg/L. Microbial diversity analysis showed higher bacterial diversity on day 20, and increased archaeal diversity on day 30. The dominant bacterial phyla included Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota and Fusobacteriota with Caldicoprobacter, Fastidiosipila, Tissierella, and Alkaliphilus identified as the most abundant genera, playing key roles in organic matter degradation and acetate metabolism. Among archaea, Crenarchaeota was the predominant phylum, followed by Euryarchaeota and Korarchaeota. In summary, the semi-dry co-digestion system of the four agricultural wastes was characterized by the dominance of hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanobrevibacter) coupled with the syntrophic acetate oxidation pathway under conditions of high ammonia nitrogen. These findings provide mechanistic insights into microbial regulation of semi-dry multi-substrate anaerobic digestion and support its potential application in agricultural waste management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.