ArticlePloS one2026
Grassland restoration in typical wind-eroded regions effectively increase soil organic carbon.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil organic and inorganic carbon (SOC and SIC, respectively) are the two most important carbon pools in the terrestrial carbon cycle, yet their responses to land use change in typical wind-eroded regions remain poorly understood. This study analyzed the carbon change patterns of four land use types Yanchi County, including the seasonal dynamics and driving factors of SOC, SIC, and total carbon storage under wind erosion background. According to filed measurement, the SOC and SIC contents in cropland were 3.0 g kg-1 and 12%, respectively. Compared with cropland, grassland restoration markedly increased SOC to 4.4 g kg-1 but reduced SIC to 2.7%, primarily due to enhanced organic matter inputs and the suppression of wind erosion. In contrast, shrubland restoration resulted in lower SOC (~2.4 g kg-1) and SIC (~2.5%) contents, likely because the slow decomposition of recalcitrant litter and coarse root biomass limited carbon turnover. Both SOC and SIC exhibited distinct vertical distribution patterns with depth, with SOC mainly concentrated in the 0-1 cm layer and SIC in the 1-5 cm layer. These contrasting profiles can largely be attributed to their dominant controlling factors: SOC was primarily regulated by vegetation cover, whereas SIC was strongly influenced by soil pH. Nevertheless, both carbon pools were sensitive to variations in wind erosion intensity and soil texture. These findings highlight distinct control processes over SOC and SIC, as well as underscore the surface soil (0-5 cm) as a critical interface mediating vegetation, erosion, and soil properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.