ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Collaborative mapping: Perceived environmental risk of leptospirosis in Urban communities in Salvador, Brazil.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental risks disproportionately affect socially vulnerable populations, yet most studies on urban leptospirosis have not captured residents' perceptions of these risks. We conducted a cross-sectional study between August 2018 and March 2019 across four communities in Salvador, Brazil (Marechal Rondon, Alto do Cabrito, Nova Constituinte, and Rio Sena) using a collaborative mapping approach to explore residents' perceptions of environmental health risks. The majority of participants identified sewage as the primary health risk (26-39% across communities), followed by garbage (22-28%), while leptospirosis itself was perceived as a high-risk problem by very few participants (0-4%). We found no spatial concordance between areas perceived as high risk for leptospirosis and households testing positive for the disease, nor between areas perceived as high rat risk and the locations of positive rat traps and track plates. However, a higher density of rubbish piles was observed in areas residents identified as high rubbish risk, suggesting that perceptions do reflect some on-the-ground realities. Collaborative mapping proved an effective method for capturing individual perceptions of environmental health risks and promoting community participation in generating locally relevant information. The disconnect between perceived and actual transmission risk may reflect that residents are more attuned to the broader social and environmental determinants of leptospirosis, such as sanitation and waste, than to the disease itself, a distinction that warrants further investigation to better integrate community knowledge into disease prevention and control strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.