ArticlePloS one2026
Interprofessional recognition of audiology scope of practice in hearing and balance care: Evidence from the University of Sharjah.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveClear recognition of professional scope of practice (SOP) supports timely referral and effective interprofessional care in hearing and balance services. While audiology's role in hearing assessment is well recognised, understanding of its broader scope, particularly in vestibular care during professional training, remains unclear.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional online questionnaire was administered to health-sciences students and faculty. Scenario-based classification tasks assessed attribution of audiology SOP across hearing-loss diagnosis, balance-disorder care, and a multidisciplinary vignette involving hearing loss with dizziness. A composite SOP recognition outcome was derived and logistic regression identified predictors of full SOP recognition.
resultsA total of 235 participants were analysed (95.7% students). Recognition of audiology's role in hearing-loss diagnosis was high (90.0%). Attribution in balance-disorder care was lower (73.0%) and more variable. Audiology was included in the multidisciplinary vignette by 85.6% of respondents. Full SOP recognition was observed in 71.2%. Higher audiology awareness was independently associated with full SOP recognition (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.34-2.42).
conclusionsWhile audiology's role in hearing care is widely recognised, scope attribution remains variable in vestibular and multidisciplinary contexts. Given the predominance of pre-licensure students in the sample, findings should be interpreted as reflecting professional role conceptualisation during training rather than established clinical practice. These findings highlight the importance of explicit role clarification within health-sciences education to support consistent and effective interprofessional engagement across hearing and balance care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.