ArticlePloS one2026
Mechanical work derived using markerless motion capture provides a valid indication of acute neuromuscular fatigue in tennis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whilst workload monitoring is key to managing performance and injury risk, effective strategies in tennis are not well-established. Mechanical work (external and internal components), measurable through markerless motion capture approaches, provides a novel way to quantify workload. To determine the suitability of this approach, this study investigated the association between mechanical work and acute neuromuscular fatigue. Fifteen tennis players completed a tennis-specific on-court fatiguing protocol interspersed with sprint tests. Peak sprint velocity (measure of acute neuromuscular fatigue) was correlated against mechanical work for each player. Pooled correlations (accounting for inter-individual differences) for total (external + internal) and external work, as well as external work estimated from centre of mass (CoM) proxies (pelvis and bounding box methods) were comparable, with values of -0.93 to -0.92. Although the calculated work done varied greatly between methods (~40% for pelvis method), these differences were systematic. All methods therefore appeared to provide an indication of individual players' workload (acute neuromuscular fatigue), despite the absolute values of the CoM proxy methods being inaccurate. Therefore, we recommend using the approximations only when monitoring an individual player in similar contexts. These findings present the markerless approach as a promising tool that could be implemented for non-invasive, on-court workload monitoring in tennis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.