ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Primary health care-oriented reforms: the political economy dynamics underlying health-system shifts across nine countries.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using evidence from nine countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Kenya, New Zealand, Thailand, Tunisia, and Uruguay), we analyze the political economy dynamics that emerged during implementation of primary health care (PHC)-oriented reforms. Across these cases, we identify 10 recurring health-system "shifts" toward stronger PHC orientation, which serve as a descriptive framework for examining the political economy challenges reformers faced and the strategies they used to navigate them. Primary data were collected from 356 participants through key informant interviews, focus groups, and expert consultations and were triangulated with document review. Using deductive mapping and inductive thematic analysis, we identify 10 PHC-focused health-system shifts present in some or all of the cases. These entailed shifts from: (i) short-term initiatives with limited scope to long-term, system-wide transformations; (ii) centralized control to devolved multilevel governance; (iii) hospital-centric resource allocation to strategic reallocations favoring primary care; (iv) physician-dominated care to multidisciplinary teams including non-physician providers; (v) siloed disease-focused services to integrated models of comprehensive care; (vi) peripheral, minimally regulated private sectors to their integration and actively state-stewarded participation; (vii) passive input-based budget allocations and provider payments to strategic purchasing; (viii) perceiving citizens as passive recipients of care to building active community engagement; (ix) ad hoc data collection to embedded learning and accountability; and (x) externally driven changes to local ownership for reforms. Reforms routinely triggered political economy dynamics-opposition from physicians, hospitals, specialists, and central bureaucracies; citizen skepticism; and capacity and patronage challenges under devolution. Strategies to address these included: high-level endorsement and passage of legislation; use of political and economic windows of opportunity; local capacity-building; decentralized autonomy; formal engagement with physician associations; regulated private sector participation; strategic purchasing to incentivize a PHC approach; strong data systems and assessments; community engagement; and locally grounded design with domestic capacity and financing. The paper underscores the value of anticipating political economy dynamics for designing and implementing PHC-oriented reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.