ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Subgroup identification of disparities in buprenorphine discontinuation in opioid-use disorder: A Virtual Twins machine learning approach using nationwide United States claims data, 2006-2022.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Buprenorphine retention is crucial for effective treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), yet disparities in treatment discontinuation persist. This study aims to identify and quantify disparities in buprenorphine treatment retention using a machine learning framework adapted from Virtual Twins approach focusing on disparities related to sex, age, insurance type, geographic region, mental health status and community-level Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Using a nationwide longitudinal cohort, we applied a two-stage machine learning approach. In Stage one, we trained classification models to estimate the counterfactual differences in treatment discontinuation across disparity types. Model performance was assessed using C-statistics and precision-recall curve. In Stage two, we employed regression models, decision trees and neural networks with Shapley Additive Explanations, to identify subgroups most vulnerable to the disparities and key contributing factors. Among 303,528 treatment episodes from 131,169 patients aged 18-85, 71% discontinued treatment within 180 days. Early medication adherence (3-month proportion of days covered) was the strongest predictor. Significant disparities emerged based on insurance, region, mental health status, age, and SVI. Higher discontinuation risk was observed among privately insured older adults, patients from high-SVI areas in the South without mental health diagnoses, and younger publicly insured individuals lacking psychiatric services. Psychiatric service utilization consistently mitigated discontinuation risks across subgroups. Limitations include the absence of race/ethnicity in the claims data, the inability to capture concurrent medications and initial buprenorphine dose, and lack of formal uncertainty estimates for the quantified disparities. The Virtual Twins analytical framework enabled identification of vulnerable subgroups and quantification of disparities attributable to specific risk factors. Interventions that prioritize early adherence, expand access to psychiatric services, and address structural barriers in high-SVI Southern communities and insurance-defined risk groups may improve equity in buprenorphine retention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.