ArticlePloS one2026
Validation of the Arabic Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS-Arb).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Values and their relationship with emotion processing and physical and psychological symptoms among Jewish and Arab breast cancer survivors.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional awareness is a cognitive skill that has gained recognition as being important for psychological and physical health. It is measured with the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS), which is a 20-item written performance measure in which an individual is asked to write about how they and another person would feel in a series of hypothetical scenarios. The LEAS has been translated and validated in 19 languages. The aim of the current paper is to describe the translation and validation of the LEAS in Arabic (LEAS-Arb). To achieve our goal, we recruited 134 Arabic-speaking adults ages18 and above to complete the LEAS in Arabic, along with additional self-report and performance measures that have been used in previous LEAS validation studies. Our findings support the reliability and validity of the Arabic translation of the LEAS originally created in English. The interrater reliability between the two scorers for the first ten study participants was very high, Cronbach's α = 0.951 for self, 0.997 for other, and 0.962 for total LEAS scores. Internal consistency of the 20 LEAS items alpha scores for LEAS-Arb were self-Cronbach's α = .81, other α = .96, and total α = .86. In addition, LEAS-Arb scores demonstrated convergent validity through expected associations with related constructs, including positive mood and alexithymia, consistent with prior LEAS validation studies. This study can facilitate the use of LEAS-Arb in varied settings across different Arabic speaking populations, which will allow better understanding of awareness of emotion in the Arab world and cross-culturally. This easily accessible measure can be used in clinical and research settings. Further research is needed to examine cross-cultural differences in emotional awareness as a function of culture and language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.