Trial reportPloS one2026
Better start to bilingual development: Bridging parental beliefs and science through early intervention for Polish families living in Norway.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an intervention designed to align parental beliefs about language development and bilingualism with evidence-based recommendations. Its effectiveness was evaluated in a pre-registered randomised controlled trial. Seventy-six Polish parents living and intending to raise their children in Norway participated in either the intervention (n = 40) or a control condition (n = 36). We assessed the extent to which parental beliefs were aligned with scientific evidence on language and bilingual development before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and when their children were about 9 months old. We found that the intervention was effective, i.e., it increased the alignment of parental beliefs with scientific evidence (preregistered ANOVA analysis 1). The benefits of the intervention were only seen in the experimental group. The gains were maintained when the children were around 9 months old (non-preregistered ANOVA analysis 2). A non-preregistered exploratory regression analysis 1 showed that participation in the experimental intervention accounted for 28.5% of the variance in parents' alignment of beliefs with science at posttest. Additional predictors of this alignment included participants' initial alignment at baseline, their level of engagement in the workshops, and their educational attainment. A preregistered exploratory regression analysis 2 showed that the greatest gains (the difference between posttest and pretest scores) from taking part in the intervention were found among those participants whose initial beliefs were the least aligned with science (at pretest). The gains were not associated with participants' individual engagement in the intervention, prior parenting experience (raising an older child), or their level of education. Future directions based on these data will include investigating whether changes in parental beliefs translate into improved language outcomes for their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.