SynthesisPloS one2026
A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: An international consensus study.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementing a prognostic model in clinical practice requires assessing not just its accuracy but also how it may impact patient and healthcare outcomes. Evaluating these impacts requires clinical trials that are carefully designed to select, collect, and report key outcomes. However, there is currently no consensus on which outcomes are key to evaluating the impact of prognostication. Core Outcome Sets can standardise outcome selection, collection, and reporting, and thereby improve the comparability of studies. Our study aimed to develop a preliminary Core Outcome Set for evaluating the impact of prognostication on people living with advanced cancer.
methodsFollowing the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative's recommended methodology, we first conducted a systematic review of prognostic studies and in-depth interviews with patients, informal caregivers, and clinicians. Drawing on these findings, we produced a comprehensive list of potential outcomes, which we refined and prioritised through a two-round modified Delphi survey with an international expert panel. An online consensus meeting finalised the preliminary Core Outcome Set.
resultsThe systematic review identified 70 outcomes, and the interviews contributed another 16. Consolidation produced 67 outcomes for review in the Delphi survey. A total of 49 experts from 14 countries; participated in the Delphi survey, with 31 (63%) completing both rounds. After two rounds, 34 outcomes were rated as critically important. These were discussed further in the consensus meeting, attended by 12 participants, who reached agreement on 9 core outcomes spanning five domains: physiological/clinical outcomes, global quality of life, care delivery, perceived health status, and personal circumstances.
conclusionsThis preliminary Core Outcome Set offers a standardised approach for selecting, collecting, and reporting outcomes in prognostic impact studies in advanced cancer, which could enhance the comparability of future prognostic impact studies, and thereby potentially improve clinical practice and patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.