ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Resolving competing evolutionary histories in joint ancestral state reconstruction.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resolving competing evolutionary histories in joint ancestral state reconstruction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancestral state reconstruction (ASR) is a foundational tool in comparative biology, offering insights into the evolutionary history of lineages. With each new evolutionary model, our ability to estimate ancestral states with increased biological realism has improved. However, the field has primarily relied on marginal reconstructions, which focus on individual nodes. This framework is analytically tractable and appropriate for node-specific hypotheses, but it is not designed to identify the most probable sequence of evolutionary events across a tree. We argue that for researchers interested in evolutionary trajectories, joint reconstructions provide a more effective way to characterize the full history of transitions. Traditionally, joint reconstruction algorithms focused only on the single most likely sequence, but here we use conditional probabilities derived from stochastic mapping to sample the distribution of plausible ancestral histories efficiently. Furthermore, we provide tools to quantify and summarize this joint uncertainty. Through simulations and an empirical case study, we demonstrate that joint reconstructions more effectively recover simulated trait histories than node-wise marginal estimates and that the uncertainty surrounding these histories can be biologically meaningful. We apply our methods to epidemic multidrug-resistant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.