Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954994›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Challenges in replay detection by TDLM in post-encoding resting state.

Simon Kern, Juliane Nagel, Lennart Wittkuhn, Steffen Gais, Raymond J Dolan, Gordon B Feld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Representation of Episodic Time.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon KernClinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9050-9040
Juliane NagelClinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Lennart WittkuhnInstitute of Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-6888
Steffen GaisInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Raymond J DolanMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-761X
Gordon B FeldClinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-9493

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.3030/101170886Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FE1617/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using temporally delayed linear modeling (TDLM) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated whether items associated with an underlying graph structure are replayed during a post-learning resting state. In these same data, we previously provided evidence for replay during online (non-rest) memory retrieval. Despite successful decoding of brain activity during a localizer task, and contrary to predictions, we found no evidence for replay during a post-learning resting state. To better understand this, we performed a hybrid simulation analysis in which we inserted synthetic replay events into a control resting state recorded prior to the actual experiment. This simulation revealed that replay detection using our current pipeline requires an extremely high replay density to reach significance (>1 replay sequence per second, with 'replay' defined as a sequence of reactivations within a certain time lag). Furthermore, when scaling the number of replay events with a behavioral measure, we were unable to induce a strong correlation between sequenceness and this measure. We infer that even if replay was present at plausible rates in our resting state dataset, we would lack statistical power to detect it with TDLM. Finally, contrasting our novel hybrid simulation to existing purely synthetic simulations indicated that the latter approaches overestimate the sensitivity of TDLM. We discuss approaches that might optimize the analytic methodology, including identifying boundary conditions under which TDLM can be expected to detect replay. We conclude that solving these methodological constraints will be crucial for optimizing the non-invasive measurement of human replay using MEG.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetoencephalographyMemoryRestComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsdecodinghumanMEGmemory reactivationneurosciencereplayTDLM

Identifiers

PMID41954994
PMCPMC13065329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.