Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954882›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Building the future of public health in Canada: A modified Delphi survey for updated core competencies.

Melissa MacKay, Harman S Sandhu, Alexandra Henteleff, Mandy Walker, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Sarah E Neil-Sztramko, Malcolm Steinberg, Claire Betker

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa MacKayDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. melissam@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-1528
Harman S SandhuNational Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.
Alexandra HenteleffNational Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.
Mandy WalkerNational Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.
Margaret Haworth-BrockmanRady Faculty of Health Sciences, National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Sarah E Neil-SztramkoNational Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Malcolm SteinbergFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Claire BetkerNational Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe process of updating the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 1.0, was initiated in 2023 using a multi-method approach. This included evidence syntheses, an extensive engagement process to ensure relevance to current public health challenges and a Delphi survey. The objective of this study was to assess agreement on the updated competency statements among a diverse range of public health professionals, educators, policymakers, and community representatives across Canada.

methodsA modified Delphi survey was conducted in English and French to assess agreement with 68 draft competency statements across 10 categories. Eligible participants were members of the Canadian public health community who were 18 years of age or older and able to participate in either official language. Participants rated their agreement with each statement using a 6-point Likert scale, with an a priori agreement threshold set at 70%. Agreement was defined as the number of participants who responded with 'agree' or 'strongly agree' to a statement, with a predefined threshold set at 70%. Open-ended text boxes allowed for qualitative feedback, which was analyzed thematically.

resultsHigh agreement was achieved across all competency categories and statements, with a mean agreement level of 86.1% and an average of 551 responses per statement. The highest agreement was found in the Communication category (mean agreement of 91.5%), while the Public Health Advocacy category had the lowest agreement (79.5%). Participants expressed strong support for the inclusion of new categories and updated statements not present in Release 1.0, particularly those emphasizing social justice, technology, and advocacy. Thematic analysis revealed widespread appreciation for the update and its enhanced focus on social justice, health equity, and Indigenous inclusion, alongside concerns about tailoring expectations based on professional roles and experience.

conclusionThe high agreement obtained from a diverse cross-section of stakeholders affirms the relevance of the revised categories and statements to contemporary and future public health practice. These findings supported the finalization of the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 2.0. Ongoing efforts will focus on engaging knowledge user groups and embedding the competencies into workforce planning, development, education, and training.

Indexed as

Core competenciesModified Delphi methodMulti-stage engagement projectPublic healthWorkforce development

Identifiers

PMID41954882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.