Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954844›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Evaluation of the remineralization effect of goat milk compared to cow milk and artificial saliva on demineralized enamel (an in vitro study).

Heba Khaled, Nermeen AbuBakr, Doha Mohammed Afifi, Nihal Darwish, Mohamed Farouk Rashed, Maryam Mohamed El Mansy, Ahmed Kamal El-Motayam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heba KhaledDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5027-6069
Nermeen AbuBakrDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. nermeen.abubakr@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-0070
Doha Mohammed AfifiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5932-8633
Nihal DarwishDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9800-3921
Mohamed Farouk RashedDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Oral and Dental Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-5971
Maryam Mohamed El MansyDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Oral and Dental Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-1710
Ahmed Kamal El-MotayamDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5054-5545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remineralization of early carious lesions can prevent their progression to cavitated stages. While cow milk and artificial saliva have demonstrated good remineralization potentials, the effects of goat milk remain unexplored. This study aimed to compare the remineralization capabilities of goat milk, cow milk, and artificial saliva on demineralized enamel surfaces. The tooth specimens were demineralized using citric acid, then split into three groups, each subjected to either artificial saliva, cow milk, or goat milk for remineralization. Surface roughness was measured using a Mitutoyo Surftest (SJ-210 Series), while microhardness was measured by the standard Vickers hardness method using a Wilson hardness tester, before any intervention, after demineralization, and after remineralization. Additionally, scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination was performed at baseline, following demineralization, and remineralization. The groups did not significantly differ from one another in roughness and microhardness at baseline and following demineralization. However, following remineralization, there was a statistically significant difference between goat milk and both artificial saliva and cow milk groups, where goat milk revealed the least roughness and the highest microhardness. No significant distinctions were found between the artificial saliva and cow milk groups. A strong negative correlation between roughness and microhardness was established across all three groups. SEM confirmed goat milk to have a comparable surface morphology with the other two groups, showing a homogenous surface with few irregularities. In conclusion, goat milk demonstrated a promising remineralization potential compared to artificial saliva and cow milk. This study emphasizes the value of goat milk as a natural alternative to remineralizing agents, offering a simple yet effective strategy to prevent early carious lesions and combat demineralization.

Indexed as

Artificial salivaCow milkDemineralized enamelGoat milkRemineralization

Identifiers

PMID41954844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.