ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
What, how, and when matters: acceptability and preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among people who inject drugs in New Delhi, India.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), particularly long-acting injectable formulations (LAI PrEP), has the potential to reduce the number of new infections among people who inject drugs (PWID), especially in low resource settings in the context of low coverage of harm reduction services, high HIV incidence, and substance use and instability. Few studies have examined PrEP perceptions, preferences, and service delivery models among these populations. We aimed to characterize acceptability, perceptions, preferences, and barriers/facilitators of different PrEP options, including LAI PrEP, among a cohort of PWID in New Delhi, India. This mixed methods study (March 2024-March 2025) included focus group discussions (FGDs) followed by cross-sectional survey data covering PrEP awareness, acceptability, and preferences and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) on LAI PrEP. FGDs indicated there was little prior awareness of and interest in PrEP, with concerns about what PrEP medications may do to their body or how it would make them feel. Hesitation surrounding PrEP was also driven by low personal HIV risk perception. Among 389 surveyed, 96% had no prior knowledge of PrEP; 72% indicated they would rather not take PrEP, with 20% preferring LAI PrEP, 5% weekly pills, 3% undecided, and no one preferred daily pills. Preferred characteristics of LAI PrEP were less frequent injections, delivery at existing healthcare clinics, and payment or incentives. PrEP programs of any modality aiming to build demand and deliver PrEP to PWID should consider how these populations often differ substantively in knowledge, needs, and preferences from other populations that have so far been the focus of PrEP campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.