ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026
Efficacy and Risks of Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET) for Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChronic low back pain, particularly discogenic pain, remains challenging to treat effectively due to complex underlying mechanisms and variability in patient response. Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET) has emerged as a minimally invasive intervention to alleviate discogenic back pain through targeted thermal denaturation of nociceptive nerve fibers and collagen remodeling within the intervertebral disc. The present investigation critically examines existing literature to assess efficacy, safety profile, optimal patient selection criteria, and relative effectiveness compared to alternative minimally invasive treatments such as nucleoplasty and radiofrequency annuloplasty. RECENT
findingsWhile several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses suggest IDET provides moderate short-term relief, some studies highlight significant placebo effects and question its long-term efficacy. Notably, careful patient selection, guided by clinical presentation and diagnostic imaging, emerges as a critical factor influencing outcomes. This review addresses potential complications, including rare but serious conditions like cauda equina syndrome and discitis. Emerging techniques such as biacuplasty and radiofrequency annuloplasty are also discussed, contextualizing IDET among other minimally invasive thermal procedures. Further research with rigorous methodological standards and consistent patient criteria is necessary to clarify the clinical utility of IDET and identify the patient populations most likely to benefit from this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41954807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.