ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Resilience Challenges in Bioeconomy Policies: A Global Comparative Analysis.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond petrochemicals: challenges and opportunities in industrial-scale biomanufacturing.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Resilience Challenges in Bioeconomy Policies: A Global Comparative Analysis.Environmental management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sustainability of social-ecological systems has become a major concern in environmental policy and beyond, triggering many integrated cross-policy initiatives. An important example are bioeconomy strategies. Policies to promote a bio-based economy have been enacted in more than 50 countries around the world, often in response to the sustainability challenges posed by the fossil-based economy. However, the success and sustainability of the bioeconomy, in turn, depends on the resilience of the bio-based production systems on which it rests. Simultaneously, the continued delivery of the desired functions of these systems is potentially threatened by environmental, social, economic, and political short-term shocks and long-term stresses. Prudent bioeconomy policies would therefore identify potential disruptions and develop pro-active strategies to address them. However, little is known to what extent and which resilience challenges for a sustainable bioeconomy have been addressed in bioeconomy policies. To investigate the salience of resilience challenges in bioeconomy policies, we conducted a systematic content analysis of 78 national bioeconomy policy documents in 50 countries published between 2005 and 2020 to identify and discuss the specific challenges and the instruments directly aimed at addressing them. The results show that bioeconomy policy documents largely pay little attention to resilience challenges. If mentioned at all, challenges are mostly framed in economic terms, with few concrete instruments proposed to enhance resilience. Overall, the general neglect of resilience issues in global bioeconomy policymaking underscores the need for stronger foresight, cross-sector dialogue, and the explicit integration of resilience considerations into environmental management and bioeconomy policy design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.