ArticlePsychological research2026
Metacognitive reflections on trajectory strategies in mixed reality: real-time and retrospective reports during mental jigsaw puzzles.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-world object fitting often requires indirect, detour-like trajectories due to physical constraints, such as lifting and maneuvering physical puzzle pieces. Reflecting this, recent work using three-dimensional puzzle stimuli has reported asymmetric reaction time (RT) patterns around 180° in fitting tasks—and unexpectedly, even in classical mental rotation tasks that require object matching. This finding challenges the classical assumption that equal angular disparities yield equivalent RTs. One possible interpretation is that RTs reflect not only rotational but also translational components of mental manipulations; however, classical matching tasks contain no physical obstacles that would necessitate detour-like trajectories. Thus, behavioral RT data alone are insufficient for determining whether detour-like mental translations are actually involved. To address this limitation, the present study incorporated metacognitive reflection on translational trajectories during both fitting tasks and classical matching tasks. Participants first completed both tasks under speed–accuracy instructions, after which they retrospectively selected the animation (shortcut vs. detour trajectories) that best represented their strategies during these earlier cognitive tasks. These retrospective reflection reports were compared with real-time reflection reports to assess their malleability. Replicating previous work, RTs showed robust asymmetries around 180° in both tasks. Crucially, subjective strategy reports diverged from these behavioral patterns: retrospective reflections mirrored RT asymmetries in the fitting task but not in the classical matching task. Moreover, metacognitive reflections were malleable in the fitting task, whereas they remained stable in the matching task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.