ArticleOecologia2026
Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) to explore the diet of the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) during winter on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The plateau pika, a keystone species of the Tibetan Plateau, is also widely poisoned as an agricultural pest. An intriguing observation is that pika are more abundant where their main competitor (domestic yak) is also most abundant. A recent study showed that this may be because pika supplement their diet in winter by consuming yak feces. Here we used quantitative fatty acid signatures analysis to explore pika diet and detect the possibility of coprophagy. We collected fat tissue from pika at 3 sites of varying elevation, and compared the abundance of 10 fatty acids (FA) in their body fat with those in their main potential foods (grass, roots and feces). We used an optimization program to establish the best-fit diet to the observed FA distributions, using mouse fat as a negative control. Pika fat FA signatures matched plateau foods far better than mouse fat. Faeces consumption doubled as the elevation of the site increased from 12.8% at the lowest site to 26.8% at the highest. In contrast consumption of roots showed the opposite pattern, comprising 32% at the lowest elevation and falling to virtually zero at the highest. That might reflect the time that the surface ground is frozen inhibiting the ability to dig for roots at higher elevation sites. Our data support the previous suggestion that pika eat yak feces, potentially giving them an over-winter survival advantage increasing their populations where yak are abundant. The full extent of coprophagy however requires more data in a larger population sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.