Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954685›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy.

Dmitry Patashov, Li Liu, Jion Tominaga, Kai Nakajima, Hiroki Miyanaga, Shoji Tsunematsu, Takanori Kato, Keita Tanaka, Hiromu Sakai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dmitry PatashovWaseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. DmitryP@aoni.waseda.jp.
Li LiuGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Jion TominagaFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kai NakajimaFaculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki MiyanagaSumitomo Heavy Industries, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji TsunematsuSumimec Engineering, Niihama, Japan.
Takanori KatoSumitomo Heavy Industries, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keita TanakaDepartment of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan.
Hiromu SakaiWaseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP 23H05493Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP 23K17272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study suggests a new analysis pipeline of MEG data, uniquely designed for neural decoding of small-sized datasets. It combines classic methods that assume stationarity of the data together with non-stationary methods to compensate for the distortions created by the classic approach. Popular Fourier-based methods are applied in a classic fashion, followed by additional filters using empirical mode decomposition and principal component analysis to further clean the data. An automated approach for epoch rejection is proposed as well. In this work, we propose a novel approach for data augmentation. Unlike most other solutions, combinations' averaging technique can be used on real data rather than synthetic one, making it more reliable from the neuroscientific point of view. It is also shown that this approach does not create any unnatural patterns within the augmented data. The proposed approach allows for application of machine learning algorithms on small-sized datasets. This broadens the list of available analyses for datasets with limited number of recorded examples. An image naming task was used for in-subject neural decoding estimations. In this work, we propose and compare four different machine learning designs. It is shown that a careful selection of the used channels, reduction of the feature dimensions, and averaging of the recorded epochs may significantly increase the accuracy of neural decoding.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetoencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansBiomagnetismCAData augmentationEMDMachine learningMEGNeural decodingPCASignal processing

Identifiers

PMID41954685
PMCPMC13391774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.