ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study suggests a new analysis pipeline of MEG data, uniquely designed for neural decoding of small-sized datasets. It combines classic methods that assume stationarity of the data together with non-stationary methods to compensate for the distortions created by the classic approach. Popular Fourier-based methods are applied in a classic fashion, followed by additional filters using empirical mode decomposition and principal component analysis to further clean the data. An automated approach for epoch rejection is proposed as well. In this work, we propose a novel approach for data augmentation. Unlike most other solutions, combinations' averaging technique can be used on real data rather than synthetic one, making it more reliable from the neuroscientific point of view. It is also shown that this approach does not create any unnatural patterns within the augmented data. The proposed approach allows for application of machine learning algorithms on small-sized datasets. This broadens the list of available analyses for datasets with limited number of recorded examples. An image naming task was used for in-subject neural decoding estimations. In this work, we propose and compare four different machine learning designs. It is shown that a careful selection of the used channels, reduction of the feature dimensions, and averaging of the recorded epochs may significantly increase the accuracy of neural decoding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.