ArticlePsychological research2026
The relationship between individual sensitivity to music reward and rhythmic processing.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhythm is a fundamental aspect of music, naturally developing in humans, engaging perceptual, emotional, and motor processes, and in turn relying on multiple cognitive functions such as memory and attention. Rhythm is also closely linked to music reward, as musical pleasure arises from making and resolving predictions about temporal structures. However, this relationship remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, in the present study, a sample of non-musicians (i.e., with less than 3 years of formal musical training, N = 121) performed tasks and questionnaires assessing the multidimensional nature of rhythmic abilities and the individual sensitivity to music reward (i.e., musical hedonia). Rhythmic skills were indexed measuring rhythm production (Finger-Tapping), perception (CA-BAT), and memory (MET), while musical hedonia was evaluated using the extended version of the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (eBMRQ). Results indicated that individuals with higher musical hedonia showed higher timing consistency in the Finger-Tapping task and increased sensitivity to asynchrony variations in the CA-BAT. Additional analyses restricted to participants with 0 years of formal musical training showed a similar effect for the MET task, with higher musical hedonia predicting higher accuracy. Beyond this general trend, we also found specific subcomponents of the eBMRQ to be specifically related to enhanced rhythmic perception, production, or memory outcomes. These findings clearly demonstrate a relationship between rhythmic skills and individual sensitivity to music reward, suggesting that musical hedonia is strongly associated with rhythmic processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.