ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
A novel prognostic scoring system HATS for acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06702111 (Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) in Adults: Clinical Outcome and Complications
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal prognostication model for outcome following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains undefined. To establish a prognostic scoring system, 466 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT from 2014 to 2023 were analyzed as a training cohort. Six donor, leukemia and recipient related factors were identified as prognostically significant and assigned weighted scores, respectively 1 point each for donor cytomegalovirus seropositivity, Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index ≥ 2, secondary AML, not in first complete remission, and low-intensity induction therapy; 3 points for inv(3)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) or KMT2A rearrangement; 4 points for − 5/del(5q) or TP53 mutation; 0 point for CEBPA bZIP in-frame mutation or core-binding factor AML; and 1 point for all other genetic risk groups. Scores were grouped into four risk categories: favorable (0–1), intermediate (2–3), poor (4–5), and very poor (≥ 6); constituting the HATS prognostication model. The corresponding 2-year overall survivals of favorable, intermediate, poor and very poor risk groups were 92%, 78%, 50%, and 7.4% (log-rank P < 0.001). An external validation cohort comprising 395 patients was similarly analyzed. With concordance statistics, HATS outperformed all six existing prognostication models. In conclusion, HATS represents a novel prognostication model devised for AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06702111.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.