Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954647›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Engaging in target choice enhances explicit visuomotor adaptation.

Darrin O Wijeyaratnam, Erin K Cressman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Darrin O WijeyaratnamFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5S9, Canada. darrin.wijeyaratnam@uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-3411
Erin K CressmanFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5S9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-1840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercising choice has been shown to enhance one’s motivation, sense of autonomy, and even ability to learn new motor skills. This study looked to determine the impact of engaging in task-relevant choices on visuomotor adaptation. Participants trained to reach with cursor feedback that was rotated 40° clockwise relative to their hand motion (rotated cursor). A choice group (n = 56) selected their reach target prior to moving, while a yoked group (n = 54) reached to targets in the same order as participants in the choice group. After reaching with rotated cursor feedback, explicit (conscious strategy) and implicit (unconscious) adaptation were assessed using the process dissociation procedure (PDP). The choice group reported a greater sense of autonomy compared to the yoked group. Both groups adapted their reaches to a similar extent during rotated training trials and repeatedly choosing targets in the same sequence did not impact the extent of visuomotor adaptation achieved. Notably, the choice group took significantly longer to initiate their reaches across rotated training trials compared to the yoked group. In addition, the choice group demonstrated greater explicit adaptation compared to the yoked group after the rotated training trials, while implicit adaptation was comparable between groups. These findings indicate that while task-relevant choices do not benefit visuomotor adaptation, they selectively enhance explicit contributions, likely by encouraging increased cognitive processes during training.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalChoice BehaviorPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultExplicit adaptationMotor learningPerceived autonomySelf-controlled practiceTask-relevant choiceVisuomotor adaptation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.