ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Presence of a human catcher affects performance in a ball-throwing task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Target characteristics can influence motor performance in goal-directed tasks by affecting cognitive and affective processes. This study investigated whether motor performance in a ball-throwing task differed when the target was held by a person, compared with when the target was a physical mark. Eighteen healthy adults without baseball experience participated. Each participant threw 15 fastballs across three blocks, each with a different target condition. In the Mark condition, the target was a visible mark on the net. In the Humanoid condition, the same mark was placed on a humanoid board. In the Catcher condition, the mark was held by a person. Mean ball speed, absolute error of arrival positions, pupil diameter, and subjective ease of throwing were compared across conditions. Mean ball speed and absolute error were significantly lower in the Catcher condition than in the other two conditions. Conversely, pupil diameter and subjective ease were significantly higher in the Catcher condition. These results indicate that when the target is held by a person, participants prioritized accuracy over speed. Increased pupil diameter in the pre-movement state suggests heightened arousal in the Catcher condition, which was associated with improved accuracy. Subjective ease also increased in this condition. These findings suggest that an implicit social or safety-related goal of allowing the person to catch the ball, such as safety and harm-avoidance considerations for the catcher, led participants to focus more on precise throws, contributing to the understanding of how cognitive and affective processes influence motor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.