ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Comparison of electromyographic recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block between the adductor pollicis and the flexor hallucis brevis muscles in pediatric patients younger than two years.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the onset and spontaneous recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block between the adductor pollicis (hand) and flexor hallucis brevis (foot) muscles in pediatric patients younger than two years.
methodsPatients younger than two years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. A TetraGraph electromyography monitor was applied to each of the ulnar and posterior tibial nerves to monitor train-of-four (TOF) responses of the hand and foot. Spontaneous recovery following rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was observed until the end of surgery. Endotracheal intubation was performed when a TOF count (TOFC) = 0 was observed at the foot. The primary outcome was the time from administration of rocuronium to TOFC = 1. Secondary outcomes included onset time, other recovery parameters, and intubating conditions. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsNo significant differences were observed in onset and recovery times to TOFC = 1, 2, or 4; or to a TOF ratio of 0.4, between the hand and foot. Intubating conditions, including the ease of laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and reaction to insertion of the endotracheal tube, were rated as excellent in all patients.
conclusionIn patients younger than two years, neuromuscular recovery from rocuronium did not differ between the hand and foot. This finding suggests that the foot may be a reasonable alternative site for neuromuscular monitoring and that TOFC = 0 at the foot represents an appropriate timing for endotracheal intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41954615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.