Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954612›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2026

[Repetitive intentional foreign body ingestion: Risk of abuse of propofol in endoscopic procedures].

Elena Böttcher, Tim Papenfuß, Maximilian Gahr

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena BöttcherPsychotherapie und Psychosomatische Medizin Schloss Werneck, Krankenhaus für Psychiatrie, Balthasar-Neumann-Platz 1, 97440, Werneck, Deutschland. elena.boettcher@kh-schloss-werneck.de.
Tim PapenfußAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Orthopädisches Krankenhaus, Balthasar-Neumann-Platz 1, 97440, Werneck, Deutschland.
Maximilian GahrPsychotherapie und Psychosomatische Medizin Schloss Werneck, Krankenhaus für Psychiatrie, Balthasar-Neumann-Platz 1, 97440, Werneck, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntentional foreign body ingestion (iFBI) represents an increasingly relevant clinical challenge that remains insufficiently evidence based in terms of treatment. Existing somatic (gastroenterologic) and psychiatric care structures may contribute to the maintenance of this behavior.

objectiveThe aim of the present study is to highlight an aspect of the treatment of iFBI that has received little attention to date: the potential risk of misuse and dependence associated with propofol in the context of repeated endoscopic interventions. Our goal is to raise awareness that for vulnerable patient groups with iFBI such as individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD), propofol should be considered not only as an anesthetic agent but also as a substance with dependency potential and as a positive dysfunctional reinforcer within complex behavioral patterns. MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative review of the pharmacological characteristics as well as the potential for misuse and addictive potential of propofol in the context of endoscopic interventions, based on published literature (case reports and retrospective studies). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The literature reports euphoric and anxiolytic effects of propofol related to endoscopic procedures, which may persist beyond the immediate post-procedural period. In addition, a potential risk of propofol misuse and dependence is discussed in the context of endoscopic interventions. When indirect propofol misuse is suspected in the setting of intentional foreign body ingestion (iFBI), alternative sedation strategies should be considered.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaBorderline personality disorderNon-suicidal self injurySedativesSubstance abuse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.