Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954599›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

The dominance of large-scale phase dynamics in human cortex, from delta to gamma.

David M Alexander, Laura Dugué

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M AlexanderUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4583-8950
Laura DuguéUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-1458

Funding

European Research Council European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant No 852139 - Laura Dugué)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The organization of the phase of electrical activity in the cortex is critical to inter-site communication, but the balance of this communication across large-scale (>8 cm), macroscopic (>1 cm), and mesoscopic (1 cm to 1 mm) ranges is an open question. The spatial frequencies (i.e. the spatial scales) of cortical waves have been characterized in the gray matter for micro- and mesoscopic scales of cortex and show decreasing spatial power with increasing spatial frequency. This research, however, has been limited by the size of the measurement array, thus excluding large-scale traveling waves. Obversely, poor spatial resolution of extracranial measurements prevents incontrovertible large-scale estimates of spatial power. We estimate the spatial frequency spectrum of phase dynamics in order to quantify the uncertain large-scale range, utilizing stereotactic electroencephalogram to measure local-field potentials within the gray matter. We take advantage of the large extent of spatial coverage of the cortical sheet, and irregular sampling is offset by use of linear algebra techniques. We find the spatial power of the phase is highest at the lowest spatial frequencies (longest wavelengths), consistent with the power spectra ranges for micro- and meso-scale dynamics, but here shown up to the size of the measurement array (up to 8-16 cm). This result arises across a wide range of temporal frequencies, from the delta band (1-3 Hz) through to the high gamma range (60-100 Hz).

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexDelta RhythmGamma RhythmElectroencephalographyGray MatterHumanscortexhumanlarge-scaleneurosciencesEEGspatial frequencytemporal frequencytraveling waves

Identifiers

PMID41954599
PMCPMC13065328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.