ArticleMicrobial genomics2026
Public and patient involvement: exploring public partnership in pathogen whole-genome sequencing research and its data visualisation.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathogen genomics is increasingly used in publicly funded studies and has important implications for understanding infectious diseases and their spread. However, unlike many other research areas, it has seen little patient and public involvement (PPI), thereby missing opportunities to enhance both research processes and outcomes. This project addressed that gap by exploring the potential contribution of PPI to pathogen genomics, using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data visualisation as an exemplar.Following ethical approvals, three 2 h PPI workshops involving five public contributors and six academic contributors were held online. Sessions were documented using visual meeting notes. Workshops were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using an iterative thematic analysis.Two interconnected themes were identified. First, effective public involvement required collaborative sense-making, achieved through co-producing a shared knowledge base, establishing consistent terminology and developing effective practices for knowledge exchange. Second, participants highlighted three priority areas for meaningful PPI in future pathogen genomics research: (i) prioritising research questions, (ii) contributing to decisions about data collection and use and (iii) supporting the communication of findings.Although pathogen genomics is technically complex, this did not prevent productive discussion about how, where and why PPI could be integrated into research. Expanding PPI in this area could help align pathogen WGS research with patient priorities, inform approaches to data governance and improve the accessibility of research outputs to the public. Realising this potential, however, will require active engagement from researchers in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.