Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954501›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2026

From Neoantigens to Nanocarriers: Modern Methods and Modalities in Using Peptides for Cancer Vaccination.

Aleah Harris Treiterer, Blaise Robinson, Sean Huggins, Blaise R Kimmel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aleah Harris TreitererDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Blaise RobinsonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Sean HugginsDepartment of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Blaise R KimmelDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9582-9887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of cancer vaccination depends on the ability of therapeutics to sustain prolonged immune activation, leading to the destruction of tumor cells. However, only a few therapeutic cancer vaccines have been FDA-approved due to challenges in targeting and eliciting a sufficiently strong immune response. Peptides have emerged as promising drugs owing to their ability to interact with cell-surface receptors and their low manufacturing cost. Despite the peptides' positive characteristics, additional research is needed to develop more effective methods for using peptides to stimulate the immune system for a sustained period to induce tumor cell regression. This review focuses on recent work in peptide-based vaccine design and development, aiming to determine the optimal formulation of peptide vaccines by identifying and isolating neoantigens for tumor targeting, thereby delivering peptide antigens to specific locations. The expansion of the current landscape of cancer treatments, including peptide vaccines and combination therapies, is revolutionizing the possibilities for patient care and treatment.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesNeoplasmsPeptidesAnimalsDrug CarriersHumansProtein Subunit VaccinesVaccinationVaccines, SubunitAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesDrug CarriersPeptidesProtein Subunit VaccinesVaccines, Subunitantigenscancerpeptidesprophylactictherapeuticvaccinations

Identifiers

PMID41954501
PMCPMC13104031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.