Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954434›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026

ConforFold recovers alternative protein conformations beyond MSA subsampling.

Raulia Syrlybaeva, Eva-Maria Strauch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raulia SyrlybaevaDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Eva-Maria StrauchDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Computational design and development of small protein inhibitorsR01AI180127 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Eva-Maria Strauch · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
NIH HHS R01AI180127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conformational changes underlie many aspects of protein function, yet current structure prediction tools remain limited in their ability to systematically sample structural ensembles. Here, we present ConforPSSP and ConforFold, a combined framework that integrates secondary-structure sampling into a deep learning-based prediction to recover multiple protein conformational states. ConforPSSP employs a transformer model trained on multi-residue fragments to generate diverse 8-state protein secondary structure predictions (PSSPs), which are then used to condition a retrained OpenFold model (ConforFold). ConforFold achieved state-of-the-art performance in conformer recovery. On our test dataset of protein samples with two alternative conformations, it correctly identified both conformers in 84% of cases at TM-scores ≥0.8, outperforming AlphaFlow (75.4%), which uses diffusion-based sampling, and Cfold, which relies on MSA clustering. It outperformed BioEmu, a novel method that emulates MD simulation results, in cases where secondary structures between conformers differ significantly (83% and 76% of cases for ConforFold and BioEmu, respectively). These results establish ConforFold as a broadly applicable framework for modeling structural ensembles. It recovers conformations inaccessible to MSA-based subsampling or diffusion models by explicitly integrating secondary structure, offering a new avenue for investigating conformational heterogeneity, mechanistic transitions, and the structural basis of protein function.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningProteinsSoftwareMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryProteinsAlphaFoldmachine learningOpenFoldprotein conformersprotein secondary structures

Identifiers

PMID41954434
PMCPMC13064411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.