ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2026
The sampling bottleneck in antimicrobial susceptibility testing: consequences and paths forward.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is based on inocula derived from a small number of colonies, creating a substantial sampling bottleneck relative to the complexity of within-host bacterial populations. Although this limitation is well recognized, its clinical impact is likely limited in many immunocompetent hosts, where effective immune responses and adequate antimicrobial exposure buffer against the influence of low-frequency resistant subpopulations. However, genomic and mechanistic studies show that such subpopulations can exist at low frequencies and may become clinically relevant in high-risk settings, including persistent or high-burden infections and in profoundly immunocompromised patients. This article outlines the biological basis of the sampling constraint, clarifies when it is most likely to matter, and discusses targeted population-based and sequencing-informed adjunct approaches that may complement reference AST in select scenarios. Improving transparency around these limitations-without undermining confidence in standardized methods-supports antimicrobial stewardship and more nuanced interpretation in defined clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.