ReviewPathologica2025
Gastric perineurioma detected in routine endoscopy biopsy practice: case report and review of clinico-pathological findings in the literature.
Review in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perineuriomas are soft tissue neoplasms composed almost entirely of cells resembling perineurium and their occurrence in gastrointestinal tract is quite rare, with most of reported cases occurring in the colon. No more than 12 cases of gastric perineurioma have been reported to date, and the diagnosis in a routine endoscopy biopsy service can be challenging given the broad differentials of a bland-looking spindle cell proliferation in gastric mucosa. Here we present a case of a gastric perineurioma in a 39-year-old woman detected in routine endoscopy biopsy where a high degree of suspicion of the pathologist and targeted immunohistochemical investigations for perineurial markers EMA and GLUT1 allowed the correct diagnosis. Reviewing the literature, it appears that gastric perienuriomas most commonly occur in mid-age females and are often detected in routine endoscopies, with appearance of a benign-looking mid-sized sessile polyp. Special attention is needed to discriminate with GIST to avoid inappropriate further investigations and overtreatment. Moreover, we speculate that these lesions are likely underrecognized in busy routine gastrointestinal biopsy service, as most are probably dismissed as benign mesenchymal polyps/submucosal proliferations after exclusion of GIST or are misdiagnosed as inflammatory fibroid polyp in the case of CD34 positivity. However, the case presented demonstrates that, in light of the apparently typical occurrence in mid-aged females with endoscopic impression of benign polyp of the body, general pathologists of routine biopsy services should also have a high degree of suspicion and maybe add a perineural marker to their panel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.