Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954346›Full record

ReviewPathologica2025

Gastric perineurioma detected in routine endoscopy biopsy practice: case report and review of clinico-pathological findings in the literature.

Ilaria Girolami, Stefania Neri, Federico Desideri, Rima Cepurnaite, Francesco Erdini, Esther Hanspeter

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilaria GirolamiDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität.
Stefania NeriDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität.
Federico DesideriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Service, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität.
Rima CepurnaiteDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität.
Francesco ErdiniDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität.
Esther HanspeterDepartment of Pathology, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perineuriomas are soft tissue neoplasms composed almost entirely of cells resembling perineurium and their occurrence in gastrointestinal tract is quite rare, with most of reported cases occurring in the colon. No more than 12 cases of gastric perineurioma have been reported to date, and the diagnosis in a routine endoscopy biopsy service can be challenging given the broad differentials of a bland-looking spindle cell proliferation in gastric mucosa. Here we present a case of a gastric perineurioma in a 39-year-old woman detected in routine endoscopy biopsy where a high degree of suspicion of the pathologist and targeted immunohistochemical investigations for perineurial markers EMA and GLUT1 allowed the correct diagnosis. Reviewing the literature, it appears that gastric perienuriomas most commonly occur in mid-age females and are often detected in routine endoscopies, with appearance of a benign-looking mid-sized sessile polyp. Special attention is needed to discriminate with GIST to avoid inappropriate further investigations and overtreatment. Moreover, we speculate that these lesions are likely underrecognized in busy routine gastrointestinal biopsy service, as most are probably dismissed as benign mesenchymal polyps/submucosal proliferations after exclusion of GIST or are misdiagnosed as inflammatory fibroid polyp in the case of CD34 positivity. However, the case presented demonstrates that, in light of the apparently typical occurrence in mid-aged females with endoscopic impression of benign polyp of the body, general pathologists of routine biopsy services should also have a high degree of suspicion and maybe add a perineural marker to their panel.

Indexed as

Nerve Sheath NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGastric MucosaGastroscopyHumansImmunohistochemistryBiomarkers, Tumorcase reportgastric polypperineuriomaperipheral nerve sheet tumorsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41954346
PMCPMC13094317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.