ArticlePathologica2025
Distinction of thymic carcinoma and type B3 thymoma using ancillary biomarkers.
Article in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Thymic carcinomas (TC) are rare and understudied tumors. Pitfalls exist with TC diagnosis, and biomarkers are needed to support the pathologist. Here, we tested a series of biomarkers to differentiate TC from type B3 thymoma. Methods: A consecutive series of 48 patients, 26 with TC and 22 with type B3 thymoma entered the study. Immunohistochemical expression of CD5, CD117, BAP1, MTAP, Ki-67 was evaluated. CDKN2A status was assessed by FISH. Results: CD5 and CD117 were expressed in TC only (n = 19 and n = 20 respectively). Five TC did not show CD5 or CD117 expression. BAP1 expression was lost in 3 TC, while MTAP staining was absent in 3 TC and 1 type B3 thymoma. Conclusions: CD5 and CD117 are the best markers for TC. While the addition of other markers (i.e., BAP1 loss, MTAP loss and CDKN2A deletion) might be useful in cases negative for CD5 and CD117, rare cases of type B3 thymoma might harbor these alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.