ReviewPathologica2025
The clinical impact of precise assessment of predictive biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer: focus on the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and tumor area positivity (TAP) systems.
Review in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab-Based Therapy in Recurrent or Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer research: a bibliometric and visualized analysis from 1993 to 2026.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of PD-L1 expression is crucial for therapeutic decision-making in esophageal, esophago-gastric junction, and gastric cancers, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have become integral to first-line treatment in selected patients. This review provides an updated, practice-oriented summary on PD-L1 immunohistochemistry evaluation, with emphasis on the emerging Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) scoring system together with established Combined Positive Score (CPS) and Tumor Proportion Score. First, we examine the clinical relevance and use in clinical trials of each scoring method, and the pre-analytical and analytical variables influencing PD-L1 interpretation. Then, we address advantages and disadvantages of each scoring system, including a thorough analysis and pictorial interpretation guide of the recently introduced TAP score. Indeed, thanks to a visual-estimation-based assessment of PD-L1 expression, TAP has improved reproducibility and reduced scoring time, but large-scale validation is ongoing and certain interpretive challenges remain. Finally, we propose a standardized reporting template to enhance consistency in diagnostic practice, together with our perspective on future improvements and challenges of PD-L1 assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.