Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954339›Full record

ReviewPathologica2025

The clinical impact of precise assessment of predictive biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer: focus on the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and tumor area positivity (TAP) systems.

Alessandro Gambella, Valentina Angerilli, Federica Grillo, Filippo Pietrantonio, Alessandro Vanoli, Paola Parente, Paola Cassoni, Maria Cristina Macciomei, Alessandro Caputo, Francesco Giuseppe Carbone and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alessandro Gambella *Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Valentina Angerilli *Surgical Pathology Unit, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.
Federica GrilloDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Filippo PietrantonioMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro VanoliDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paola ParenteUOC Anatomia Patologica Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Paola CassoniCittà della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, Turin.
Maria Cristina MacciomeiAzienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Roma.
Alessandro CaputoDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe CarboneDepartment of Laboratory Medicine - Pathology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Chiara TaffonPathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Carla GiordanoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luca Mastracci *Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Matteo Fassan *Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of PD-L1 expression is crucial for therapeutic decision-making in esophageal, esophago-gastric junction, and gastric cancers, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have become integral to first-line treatment in selected patients. This review provides an updated, practice-oriented summary on PD-L1 immunohistochemistry evaluation, with emphasis on the emerging Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) scoring system together with established Combined Positive Score (CPS) and Tumor Proportion Score. First, we examine the clinical relevance and use in clinical trials of each scoring method, and the pre-analytical and analytical variables influencing PD-L1 interpretation. Then, we address advantages and disadvantages of each scoring system, including a thorough analysis and pictorial interpretation guide of the recently introduced TAP score. Indeed, thanks to a visual-estimation-based assessment of PD-L1 expression, TAP has improved reproducibility and reduced scoring time, but large-scale validation is ongoing and certain interpretive challenges remain. Finally, we propose a standardized reporting template to enhance consistency in diagnostic practice, together with our perspective on future improvements and challenges of PD-L1 assessment.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorEsophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsUpper Gastrointestinal TractHumansB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, Tumorartificial intelligence.clinical trialsdigital pathologygastro-esophageal cancerimmune-checkpoint inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41954339
PMCPMC13094310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.