Observational studyCancer2026
Treatment and outcomes of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: A multicenter analysis of 186 patients.
Observational study in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) with pulmonary involvement is a rare, indolent lymphoma with no standard treatment approaches.
methodsTo clarify patient characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of pulmonary MALT lymphoma in the modern era, a multi-institutional observational study of patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 was conducted. A modified Ann Arbor system was used for the analysis.
resultsAmong 186 eligible patients, 131 (70%) had stage IE/IIE disease, whereas 55 (30%) had stage IV disease. No patient had stage III disease. With a median follow-up of 57 months, the 4-year overall survival (OS) rates for the stage IE, IIE, and IV groups were 96%, 92%, and 90%, respectively. The stage IIE and IV groups had similar progression-free survival (PFS) that was significantly worse than that of the stage IE group (p < .001). In stage IE/IIE patients, no differences were found in OS (p = .89) or PFS (p = .90) among the first-line treatment groups. In stage IV patients, the stomach was the most common synchronous extranodal site of involvement (36%). There were no differences in OS among the first-line treatment groups (p = .64).
conclusionsThe OS of patients with MALT lymphoma with pulmonary involvement was favorable regardless of first-line treatment modality, including watchful waiting. The short PFS in the stage IIE and IV groups indicates that these groups are candidates for therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.