ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
How to Teach Generative Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computational systems capable of analysing data, recognising patterns and generating outputs that may support decisions. In healthcare, AI has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide clinical decision support. As AI becomes ubiquitous in clinical workflows, clinical teachers must be prepared not only to use AI tools but also to interpret, appraise and oversee their outputs safely and effectively. However, evidence indicates that medical curricula have not kept pace with technological adoption; structured AI education remains sparse or inconsistent across institutions. To address this gap, educators must define what medical students should learn about AI and how to teach it. Whereas existing literature defines what learners should know about AI, our work provides a pragmatic framework for how they should learn to use it in practice. By integrating verification, critical appraisal and ethical reflection into everyday clinical teaching, our workflow offers a scalable and adaptable model for preparing future clinicians to engage safely and responsibly with generative AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.