Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954206›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2026

Polarization as a Process: The Potential of Process Ontology for Understanding Cellular Symmetry Breaking.

Marieke M Glazenburg, Liedewij Laan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marieke M GlazenburgDepartment of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherland.
Liedewij LaanDepartment of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherland.

Funding

European Research CouncilH2020 European Research Council 758132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in molecular cell biology has typically been focused on identifying specific genes and proteins responsible for cellular phenomena. However, it is increasingly recognized that the function of many biomolecules is variable and context dependent, raising the question if specific components can adequately explain cellular mechanisms. Philosophers of biology have proposed an alternative perspective known as process ontology, posing that not objects or molecules, but processes are the fundamental units of living systems. Process ontology is gaining popularity in biological theory, but remains challenging to integrate into scientific practice. Here, we assess the applicability of the process perspective in the context of a concrete biological system, namely polarization in budding yeast. We identify relevant processes in yeast polarization at different timescales and examine how these processes affect our understanding of polarity. Using this case study, we demonstrate how the processual perspective evokes new kinds of scientific questions and provide concrete pointers for incorporating processual thought into cell biological research.

Indexed as

Cell PolaritySaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID41954206
PMCPMC13063800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.