ArticleThe ultrasound journal2026
Quality evaluation of ultrasound images for fetal crown-rump length measurement at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation: A fusion model can be interpreted using SHAP method.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore a fusion model designed for the quality evaluation of ultrasound images utilized in fetal crown-rump length (CRL) measurement, and to use SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to elucidate the model's decision-making processes.
methodsWe retrospectively collected 1149 images of midsagittal planes of the entire fetus during early pregnancy from two hospitals. Two senior radiologists categorized the images into standard and non-standard planes. Seven image segmentation models were trained to select the best model for automatically segmenting the region of interest. The radiomics features and deep transfer learning (DTL) features were extracted and selected to establish radiomics models and DTL models. We also constructed fusion models to enhance the classification performance and the optimal one underwent comparison with radiologists. The SHAP method was employed to interpret and visualize the model.
resultsThe DeepLabV3 ResNet101 segmentation model demonstrated the highest performance (DSC: 97.15%). The early fusion model exhibited superior classification performance in validation set (AUC: 0.947, 95% CI: 0.924-0.970, accuracy: 88.4%, sensitivity: 83.0%, specificity: 92.7%, PPV: 90.1%, NPV: 87.3%, precision: 90.1%). The model demonstrated performance commensurate with that of senior radiologists while surpassing junior radiologists. Notably, when leveraging the model's support, there was a substantial improvement in their overall performance.
conclusionsThe early fusion model demonstrated satisfactory performance in the intelligent quality evaluation of ultrasound images for CRL measurement. It has the potential to enhance the professional skills of junior radiologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.