ArticleActa myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology2026
Risdiplam therapy in adult patients with Spinal muscular Atrophy (SMA). A 24-month-real-world experience at a single muscular centre.
Article in Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Treatment with Risdiplam has been recently extended to adult patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). We describe the experience of a single neuromuscular centre in Italy in treating adult SMA patients with risdiplam and analyze motor function during a follow-up period of 24 months. Patients and methods: Twelve patients with type 2 or 3 SMA (three with SMA type 3, five with SMA type 3a and four with type 3b, age range: 24-61) were included. Of them, nine were "sitter" and three were "walker"patients. The Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) and the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) were recorded at baseline and every six months. Treatment adverse events were collected at every follow-up visit. Results: All the patients reached the 24-month follow-up. Based on the HFMSE score, 50% showed an improvement compared to the baseline total scores, 41,7% remained stable, and 8.3% experienced slight clinical worsening. Based on the RULM scores, the percentages were comparable: 50% demonstrated an improvement compared to the baseline total scores, 41,7% remained stable and 8,3% slight clinical worsening. The best results were observed in the patient "walker" group. The most common adverse events were transient gastro-intestinal problems and headache. Conclusions: Our study confirms that risdiplam is well tolerated. Half of the patients improved after risdiplam initiation and about 42% remained stable. Most patients stated to be satisfied with the medication. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the long-term effects of risdiplam in adult SMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.