ArticleHealth science reports2026
IVF Outcomes After PPOS Versus Flexible GnRH-Antagonist Protocol in Advanced-Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- IVF Outcomes After PPOS Versus Flexible GnRH-Antagonist Protocol in Advanced-Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infertility affects 8%-12% of couples worldwide; advanced maternal age combined with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) significantly lowers IVF success. The flexible GnRH-antagonist and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS), are increasingly adopted for freeze-all strategies in this poor-prognosis population; however, their relative effectiveness remains inconclusive. Methods: This retrospective study (January 2017-April 2022) enrolled only women ≥ 35 years with diminished ovarian reserve (AMH < 1.2 ng/mL and/or AFC < 5). Two controlled ovarian stimulation protocols were compared: the flexible GnRH-ant protocol and the PPOS protocol. The participants were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, and antral follicle count (AFC). We compared the ovarian responses to controlled ovarian stimulation treatments and assessed the pregnancy outcomes after FET between the two groups. Results: This study included 141 patients with DOR who underwent the flexible GnRH-ant protocol ( Conclusion: Although the quality and quantity of the embryos was different, the good-quality embryo rate and pregnancy outcomes were similar in FET cycles between the flexible GnRH-ant protocol and PPOS protocol in advanced maternal age with DOR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.