ArticleDigital discovery2026
Learning potential energy surfaces of hydrogen atom transfer reactions in peptides.
Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions are essential in many biological processes, such as radical migration in damaged proteins, but their mechanistic pathways remain incompletely understood. Simulating HAT processes is challenging due to the conflicting requirements of quantum chemical accuracy and biologically relevant time and length scales; thus, neither classical force fields nor DFT-based molecular dynamics simulations are applicable. Machine-learned potentials offer an alternative, with the ability to learn potential energy surfaces (PESs) that capture reactions and transitions with near-quantum accuracy. However, training such models to generalize across diverse HAT configurations-especially at radical positions in proteins-requires tailored data generation strategies and careful model selection. In this work, we systematically generate HAT reaction configurations in peptides to build large datasets using semiempirical methods as well as DFT. We benchmark three atomistic machine-learned potential architectures, SchNet, Allegro, and MACE, on their ability to learn HAT potential energy surfaces and indirectly predict reaction barriers through direct energy predictions. MACE consistently outperforms the other models in energy, force, and reaction barrier prediction accuracy, achieving a mean absolute error of 1.13 kcal mol
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.