Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41953892›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2026

Learning potential energy surfaces of hydrogen atom transfer reactions in peptides.

Marlen Neubert, Patrick Reiser, Frauke Gräter, Pascal Friederich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marlen NeubertInstitute of Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Kaiserstr. 12 76131 Karlsruhe Germany pascal.friederich@kit.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-8195
Patrick ReiserInstitute of Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Kaiserstr. 12 76131 Karlsruhe Germany pascal.friederich@kit.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-696X
Frauke GräterMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research Mainz 55128 Germany graeter@mpip-mainz.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-3381
Pascal FriederichInstitute of Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Kaiserstr. 12 76131 Karlsruhe Germany pascal.friederich@kit.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-1465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions are essential in many biological processes, such as radical migration in damaged proteins, but their mechanistic pathways remain incompletely understood. Simulating HAT processes is challenging due to the conflicting requirements of quantum chemical accuracy and biologically relevant time and length scales; thus, neither classical force fields nor DFT-based molecular dynamics simulations are applicable. Machine-learned potentials offer an alternative, with the ability to learn potential energy surfaces (PESs) that capture reactions and transitions with near-quantum accuracy. However, training such models to generalize across diverse HAT configurations-especially at radical positions in proteins-requires tailored data generation strategies and careful model selection. In this work, we systematically generate HAT reaction configurations in peptides to build large datasets using semiempirical methods as well as DFT. We benchmark three atomistic machine-learned potential architectures, SchNet, Allegro, and MACE, on their ability to learn HAT potential energy surfaces and indirectly predict reaction barriers through direct energy predictions. MACE consistently outperforms the other models in energy, force, and reaction barrier prediction accuracy, achieving a mean absolute error of 1.13 kcal mol

Identifiers

PMID41953892
PMCPMC13054793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.