ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Proteomic biomarkers in rotator cuff disease: Current evidence and translational implications from a systematic review and network analysis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating mechanistic research and emerging technologies to advance clinical translation in orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff disorders are among the most common causes of shoulder pain and dysfunction, primarily driven by chronic inflammation and degenerative changes in tendon tissue. These alterations lead to progressive structural damage and compromised function. In recent years, proteomic profiling has emerged as a promising strategy for identifying molecular signatures associated with disease mechanisms and potential translational applications. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases, targeting studies published between 2015 and 2024. Included studies focused on proteomic biomarker analysis in synovial fluid, and blood from patients affected by rotator cuff disorders. Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the RoB 2.0 tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: Seven studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. Among the most consistently reported proteins were matrix metalloproteinase-1, matrix metalloproteinase-13, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and transforming growth factor-β1, with a predominant presence in synovial fluid samples. Enrichment analyses pointed to their involvement in inflammatory cascades, extracellular matrix turnover, and neovascularization. Network analysis of protein-protein interactions highlighted interleukin-6 and matrix metalloproteinase-13 as central nodes, indicating a pivotal role in modulating disease progression. Conclusions: The most reported biomarkers, such as matrix metalloproteinase-1, matrix metalloproteinase-13, interleukin-1 Clinical implications: The identified biomarkers, particularly interleukin-6, matrix metalloproteinase-1, matrix metalloproteinase-13, and transforming growth factor-β1, may represent candidates for inclusion in future multi-analyte diagnostic panels, pending rigorous clinical validation. However, at present these applications remain hypothetical. Further large-scale, standardized, and longitudinal studies are required to validate their incremental value beyond imaging and clinical evaluation before any clinical translation can be considered. The translational potential of this article: This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on proteomic biomarkers detectable in the synovial fluid and blood of patients with rotator cuff disorders, highlighting candidate molecules (e.g., IL-6, MMP-1, MMP-13, TGF-β1) that are mechanistically linked to inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling. While these markers are not disease-specific, they may have translational utility as components of multi-analyte panels for (1) stratifying disease severity, (2) monitoring biological response to conservative or surgical treatments, and (3) potentially informing future strategies for disease stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches. Real-world clinical translation will require standardized sample collection and assay protocols, analytical validation (targeted MS or clinical immunoassays), and prospective studies to define diagnostic thresholds and incremental value over imaging and clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.