ReviewIndian journal of palliative care
From Broad Theoretic Postulating to Precision Communication - A Contemporary Narrative Review of Cancer Communication.
Review in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review explores emerging strategies in precision cancer communication, with a focus on tailoring interactions to meet the complex needs of diverse patient populations. The purpose of this review is to highlight how theoretical frameworks and established communication protocols can be adapted to enhance patient-centred care in oncology, especially during the delivery of difficult news and discussions around prognostic awareness. Sources for this review were drawn from key journals and major databases in the fields of oncology, communication studies and digital health. The literature was selectively reviewed to identify influential models, communication protocols and empirical studies that address both verbal and non-verbal aspects of patient care. By integrating classical frameworks such as the health belief model, narrative communication theory and the extended parallel process model, along with established structured protocols, this review examines how communication still lacks individualisation to align with patient values and psychosocial context. While advances in cancer biology and treatment continue to evolve, effective communication between clinicians and patients remains a persistent challenge. Existing protocols have provided a structured approach to breaking bad news and managing sensitive conversations, yet they often overlook the subtleties of non-verbal communication and the individual emotional needs of patients. This shortfall is particularly evident among vulnerable groups. Emerging digital health tools and clinical decision support systems show promise in augmenting traditional communication methods, though they have yet to fully replicate the connection that human interaction offers. Limitations of this review include its narrative nature, which may not encompass the full scope of available evidence, and the rapid evolution of digital health interventions that may outpace current literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.