ArticleBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2026
Translation, Validation and Reliability Study of the Korean Version of Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (K-ASRS) in Patients With Post-Stroke Aphasia.
Article in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder that occurs despite the absence of paralysis, weakness, or incoordination of the speech muscles and is characterized by difficulty in planning, programming, and sequencing speech movements. Currently, the Korean language lacks sufficient measures for evaluating AOS, whereas the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS) has been widely used internationally to assess the presence and severity of AOS. This study aimed to translate the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale into Korean (K-ASRS) and verify its reliability and validity. The translation process comprised four stages: forward and backward translation, expert committee review, and author approval. Thirty native Korean speakers aged 18 years or older with post-stroke aphasia participated. Three speech-language pathologists conducted two assessments over 1 month, and intra- and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficients. Among the 30 participants, six were diagnosed with AOS. The K-ASRS effectively distinguished the presence of AOS, showing strong internal validity and excellent inter-rater reliability overall, although items five, six, and eight demonstrated only fair agreement. The K-ASRS demonstrated good-to-excellent validity and reliability in patients with post-stroke aphasia and showed high clinical utility because of its short administration time and applicability to both in-person and video assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.