ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2026
Explainable artificial intelligence in electrocardiography: A systematic review.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically-aligned explainable AI for atrial fibrillation detection: A U-Net inspired multi-lead ECG analysis framework.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Atrial Fibrillation Management: From Signal to Strategy.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Explainable CNN-BiLSTM Framework for Multi-Class Sleep Apnea Severity Detection Using Single-Lead ECG Signals: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable Devices and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Monitoring: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in the Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram by Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cornerstone of cardiac diagnostics, detecting cardiac pathologies ranging from arrhythmias to myocardial infarction. To enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, deep learning models have been developed that now match or surpass human performance in ECG interpretation. However, their opaque reasoning hinders clinical trust and regulatory approval. This challenge is particularly acute for ECG signals because, unlike structured feature data, they are sequential, variable, and noise-prone, making interpretability both more difficult and more essential for clinical adoption. This review systematically evaluates ECG-specific explainable AI techniques using PRISMA guidelines. We screened 380 records across six databases and included 45 peer-reviewed studies examining diverse explainability methods including perturbation-based, gradient-based, intrinsically interpretable, sequence-aware, and counterfactual approaches. Our analysis reveals that perturbation-based techniques designed for structured data prove suboptimal for ECG signals because they treat features as independent rather than temporally dependent. In contrast, methods that transparently reveal model attention to physiologically meaningful ECG intervals such as the P wave, QRS complex, and ST segment demonstrate superior performance across localization accuracy, fidelity, and robustness metrics. While explainable AI in ECG interpretation has advanced substantially, it remains fragmented and insufficiently validated for clinical deployment. The most promising methods reveal what the model attends to in relation to known physiologic features, yet significant challenges persist in stability, computational efficiency, and regulatory readiness. Accelerating clinical translation requires open, multi-institutional benchmarks with cardiologist-annotated explanations and clinician-in-the-loop validation studies that can strengthen trust and support meaningful integration of explainable AI into patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.