ArticleHealthcare technology letters
The Role of National Cultural Dimensions in Pandemic Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study Across 90 Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper contributes to a relatively simple and efficient referencing method for a decision-maker needs to impose or adjust the policies in fighting against a pandemic crisis. A Bayesian network (BN) model is built via referring to a pre-condition evaluated by canonical correlation analysis to diagnose the likelihood of a severe pandemic by exploring the relationship between Hofstede's national culture dimensions and mortality rate (MR) as well as some other policy-related index. Sample data retrieved from 90 countries and areas up to 13, July 2020, were used for this worldwide cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Another four countries and areas were employed to examine the accuracy of our model. Results also suggest that a strict isolation policy (PI) is possibly not an efficient way to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for those countries or areas with loose ties between individuals. The probability of a high MR, derived from three Hofstede cultural dimensions using the BN model, serves as a reliable indicator of policy implementation effectiveness. Additionally, the individualism versus collectivism (IDV) dimension, which reflects societal group integration (with lower IDV values indicating stronger cohesion), constitutes a key metric for policy assessment. The findings are intended to provide a foundation for developing strategies that strengthen preparedness and resilience in addressing comparable public health crises in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.