ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Biomechanical index for predicting the risk of acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A patient-specific biomechanical model for quantifying the stress state within coronary atherosclerotic lesions for the noninvasive prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been established. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with clearly documented ACS and available coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA) acquired between 1 month and 2 years before the development of ACS were included. In 63 culprit and 146 nonculprit lesions, lumen geometry, the presence of adverse plaque characteristics (APC), and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated using previously described methods. A novel biomechanical metric, denoted as the Cap Vulnerability Index (CVI), was calculated from cCTA data using computational solid and fluid mechanics and compared to anatomic, plaque and hemodynamics variables for the ability to discriminate culprit from nonculprit lesions. Results: Culprit lesions had a greater diameter stenosis, lesion length, more adverse plaque and hemodynamic characteristics and a greater CVI. Among all parameters evaluated, CVI had the highest AUC (0.75), was the strongest independent predictor for ACS and was comparable to previously described statistical models combining anatomy, plaque and hemodynamic variables. Conclusions: Noninvasive biomechanical assessment of coronary plaques using computational solid and fluid mechanics may improve identification of culprit lesions for ACS and simplify the interpretation of risk factors for individual lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.