ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Case Report: Diagnostic pitfalls in localized aortic root dissection: two cases and a literature review.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Localized aortic root dissection is a rare and distinct variant of aortic dissection, characterized by an intimal tear confined to the aortic root without distal propagation. Its nonspecific presentation and subtle imaging findings frequently result in diagnostic error. This report describes two cases and reviews the literature to highlight key imaging pitfalls and diagnostic considerations. Case presentation: In the first patient, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) initially misidentified the dissection as a congenital supravalvular aortic membrane, while coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) did not identify a definite aortic root dissection. The correct diagnosis was established intraoperatively. In the second patient, TTE and CTA were non-diagnostic, whereas TEE subsequently visualized the localized dissection. Notably, neither patient had significant aortic root dilatation, classic "tearing" chest pain, or features of connective tissue disease. Conclusion: Localized aortic root dissection presents with atypical symptoms and subtle, potentially confusing imaging features, leading to misdiagnosis or delayed recognition. In patients with severe aortic regurgitation of unclear etiology, this entity should be considered even in the absence of aortic root dilatation or typical tearing chest pain. Comprehensive morphological assessment of the aortic root is crucial. TEE offers a higher diagnostic yield than TTE or CTA and is useful for detection and differentiation; when clinically stable, early comprehensive TEE should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.