ReviewRSC advances2026
Tannery solid waste generation trend and sustainable management techniques for commercialization.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global rise in leather consumption has led to a significant increase in tannery solid waste (TSW), especially in developing countries where inadequate treatment practices pose serious environmental and public health risks. This study reveals that TSW generation has surged more than 100-fold over the past six decades, with production shifting predominantly to Asia. In this review, as a representative developing country, we outlined the details of the TSW generation scenario for Bangladesh and sustainable approaches to manage them, as it faces disproportionately severe impacts despite contributing less than 1% of global TSW. The review identifies major challenges in current management practices, including the inefficiency of direct disposal methods and the limited scalability of conventional dechroming techniques. Critical findings show that emerging valorization approaches, such as biodiesel production from fleshing, enzyme-assisted anaerobic co-digestion, which boosted biogas build-up to 81%, and low-temperature gasification, offer environmentally sound and commercially viable alternatives. Likewise, pyrolysis and immobilization strategies demonstrate potential for both energy recovery and resource stabilization. The study also proposes a context-sensitive hypothetical circular economy model for TSW management, integrating technological pathways with socio-economic indicators to support long-term sustainability. Ultimately, this review offers strategic insights for transitioning from linear to circular waste management frameworks. It emphasizes the importance of policy reform, stakeholder collaboration, and future research focused on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA). The proposed framework aligns with multiple Sustainable Development Goals, including SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), and SDG 15 (Life on Land), providing a pathway toward safer, inclusive, and globally certified tannery practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.